I note with interest the letters to the editor from Russell Sully and Graeme C Rose (Wangaratta Chronicle, Monday, 17 November).

There are a number of points raised in both letters that should be addressed.

Mr Rose states that he has seen no evidence wider community concerns about the development of a 550-hectare solar factory on prime agricultural land in the middle of a significant water catchment – the environmental impacts of these projects one of the major reasons the Rural City of Wangaratta council rejected the application.

I would suggest that Mr Rose get out more and beyond the circle of people who are completely removed from the effects of such a development.

He should also gain a better understanding of what developments the Rural City of Wangaratta’s planning scheme supports.

It is gratifying to know that he is willing to share the costs of solar electricity generation, however there are many in the community who don’t have this luxury or who question the location the proposed development from an environmental, social and economic perspective, even though they support renewable energy.

He appears to confuse the rejection of this proposal by council with a denial or a lack of acceptance of renewable and clean energy developments.

Nothing is further from the truth.

The Rural City of Wangaratta has supported the development of renewable energy projects in the right locations.

Mr Sully talks about “state government adjusting planning rules to fast-track energy developments” – what has happened is the state government has removed appeal rights from local government, and local communities, while also flying in the face of planning, environmental, water catchment, tourism amenity and biodiversity concerns.

I am uncertain as to why Mr Sully thinks that “this is in everyone’s interests to ensure sustainable landscapes and communities” actually applies to the Meadow Creek proposal, because from a planning and a community perspective it does not.

His comment about “better mapping of land for agriculture is relevant to Meadow Creek as it is high value land subject to flooding and it is in a water catchment” is correct – and this is part of the reason the Rural City of Wangaratta opposed this solar factory at Meadow Creek (September 2024).

While it is important to diversify and secure income from farming land, as Mr Sully states, it is equally as important to ensure this is done within orderly planning guidelines and not at the whim of a developer.

Cr Irene Grant, Mayor Rural City of Wangaratta

Wangaratta stronger for Brendan's leadership

It was my pleasure to acknowledge Brendan McGrath in the Victorian Parliament last week as he calls time on his role as CEO of the Rural City of Wangaratta.

I want to extend my warm congratulations and sincere thanks for his many years of dedicated service to our community.

Brendan has been a steady and reliable presence at the helm, someone who brings a level head to challenging moments and a sense of humour that keeps spirits high, even when the workload is heavy.

His leadership has helped guide our community through both opportunities and obstacles, always with professionalism and a genuine commitment to the people of Wangaratta.

Whether it was navigating major projects, supporting local initiatives or simply being available for a conversation, Brendan’s approach has always been thoughtful, measured and community-focused.

Our region has benefited greatly from his dedication and his willingness to roll up his sleeves and get things done.

Although he may be stepping away from the CEO’s chair, I’m grateful that he won’t be lost to our community altogether. I wish him every success in the next chapter and thank him for his years of service.

Wangaratta is stronger for his leadership, and our community is better because of his contribution.

Tim McCurdy, Nationals' MP for Ovens Valley